CVE-2026-2673

MediumCVSS 6.5/10Last modified Jun 17, 2026

Description

Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword.

Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares. This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups, if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by the server.

If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the 'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple was mutually supported.

As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction).

OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS 1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat' list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure. If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been more preferred, if included.

The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares, the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group.

The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the various desired groups and group 'tuples'.

No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies outside the FIPS boundary.

OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue.

OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released.

OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue.

Metrics

CVSS 3.1 6.5/10CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Weakness enumeration

Affected software

No affected versions have been published.

Timeline

Published
Mar 13, 2026
Last modified
Jun 17, 2026
NVD status
Analyzed

Related CVEs from 2026

CVE-2026-267318.8TOTOLINK A3002RU V2.1.1-B20211108.1455 was discovered to contain a stack-based buffer overflow via the routernamer`parameter in the formDnsvCVE-2026-267328.8TOTOLINK A3002RU V2.1.1-B20211108.1455 was discovered to contain a stack-based buffer overflow via the vpnUser or vpnPassword` parameters inCVE-2026-267368.8TOTOLINK A3002RU_V3 V3.0.0-B20220304.1804 was discovered to contain a stack-based buffer overflow via the static_ipv6 parameter in the formICVE-2026-267387.8Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Uderzo Software SpaceSniffer v.2.0.5.18 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .sCVE-2026-26748.1Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in RTI Connext Professional (Queueing Service,Core Libraries,Persistence Service) allows Overflow Buffers.CVE-2026-267408.2Buffer Overflow vulnerability in giflib v.5.2.2 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the EGifGCBToExtension overwritingCVE-2026-267418.1PX4 Autopilot versions 1.12.x through 1.15.x contain a logic flaw in the mode switching mechanism. When switching from Auto mode to Manual mCVE-2026-267428.1PX4 Autopilot versions 1.12.x through 1.15.x contain a protection mechanism failure in the "Re-arm Grace Period" logic. The system incorrectCVE-2026-267445.3A user enumeration vulnerability exists in FormaLMS 4.1.18 and below in the password recovery functionality accessible via the /lostpwd endpCVE-2026-267455.3OpenSourcePOS 3.4.1 has a second order SQL Injection vulnerability in the handling of the currency_symbol configuration field. Although the CVE-2026-267468.8OpenSourcePOS 3.4.1 contains a Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in the Sales.php::getInvoice() function. An attacker can read arbitrCVE-2026-267479.1A Host Header Poisoning vulnerability exists in Monica 4.1.2 due to improper handling of the HTTP Host header in app/Providers/AppServicePro
CVE-2026-2673: Medium severity, CVSS 6.5 | Vulnix