CVE-2026-89122

MediumCVSS 6.1/10Last modified Oct 15, 2026

Description

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal does not sufficiently validate input to a certain portal component. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link that, when clicked by a victim, loads attacker-controlled content within the trusted application context. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to track user information and deface parts of the rendered page, resulting in a low impact on confidentiality and integrity with no impact on availability.

Metrics

CVSS 3.1 6.1/10CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Weakness enumeration

Affected software

Source: the vendor's advisory (CNA). NVD analysis pending.

No affected versions have been published.

Timeline

Published
Oct 13, 2026
Last modified
Oct 15, 2026
NVD status
Awaiting Analysis

Related CVEs from 2026

CVE-2026-891244.3Display Product Catalog Based on Customs Declaration application does not perform sufficient authorization checks within certain functionaliCVE-2026-891256.0Due to Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information in SAP Web Dispatcher and Internet Communication Manager, an attacker with administrative pCVE-2026-8912610.0SAP Web Dispatcher does not sufficiently validate certain network input processed by an internal component. An unauthenticated attacker coulCVE-2026-891285.3Due to Broken Access Control in SAP NetWeaver AS Java, an unauthenticated attacker could invoke affected SOAP operations exposed over HTTP wCVE-2026-891295.8Due to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver AS Java (Web Services), an unauthenticated attacker could craft aCVE-2026-89138.5A command Injection vulnerability exists in the WireGuard client configuration of Archer MR600 v2, v3, and v5 due to improper neutralizationCVE-2026-891314.3SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal does not sufficiently protect certain server-side actions against cross-site request forgery. An unauthenticCVE-2026-891335.3wolfSSL versions 5.9.2 and earlier contain a flaw in the X.509 certificate validation logic where it fails to properly enforce NameConstrainCVE-2026-891349.1A certificate with no dNSName SAN but another SAN type present (e.g. registeredID or iPAddress) bypassed the Subject CN dNSName name-constraCVE-2026-891356.5A failed X509_verify_cert call permanently plants an unverified attacker CA in the shared CertManager, bypassing certificate validation in eCVE-2026-891368.3When using RPK (Raw Public Key), the client side of a TLS 1.2, 1.3 and DTLS 1.2 connection could accept an unsolicited server_cert_type=RawPCVE-2026-891384.3The Filter Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.4. This is due to th
CVE-2026-89122: Medium severity, CVSS 6.1 | Vulnix