CVE-2026-78358

MediumCVSS 4.3/10Last modified Oct 15, 2026

Description

Several administrative actions do not sufficiently validate whether a request was intentionally initiated by the authenticated user. In particular, the DBUpdateLogCleanUp action can be triggered through a GET request without validating a ChallengeToken. An unauthenticated remote attacker can therefore cause the browser of an authenticated administrator to execute the cleanup action by embedding a crafted request in a malicious web page. Successful exploitation can delete existing DBUpdate log entries. This may reduce the availability of diagnostic and historical information used for troubleshooting and auditing. The impact is limited to DBUpdate log entries that exist at the time the forged request is processed.

Additional administrative endpoints were identified that do not validate a ChallengeToken. Some of these endpoints can trigger administrative actions such as deploying or synchronizing already existing configuration. They do not allow an attacker to introduce arbitrary new configuration through the CSRF request itself. 

Export and read-only endpoints were also identified without ChallengeToken validation. While these endpoints may be triggered through a forged cross-site request, the response content remains subject to the browser's same-origin restrictions and is not automatically exposed to the attacker. Therefore, no direct confidentiality impact has been demonstrated for these endpoints.

This issue affects OTRS:

* 7.0.X * 8.0.X * 2023.X * 2024.X * 2025.X * 2026.X before 2026.7.X

Please note that ((OTRS)) Community Edition 6.x and before are vulnerable. Products based on the ((OTRS)) Community Edition also very likely to be affected

Metrics

CVSS 3.1 4.3/10CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Weakness enumeration

Affected software

No affected versions have been published.

Timeline

Published
Oct 12, 2026
Last modified
Oct 15, 2026
NVD status
Deferred

Related CVEs from 2026

CVE-2026-783595.4OTRS does not sufficiently enforce the uniqueness of customer user identities across multiple configured CustomerUser backends. When multiplCVE-2026-78363.1An incorrect calculation in the hextoint macro in Netatalk 2.0.0 through 4.4.2 due to improper uppercase character handling allows a remote CVE-2026-783619.1The zipMoney(Zip Co) Payments Plugin for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.4.0 does not perform any authorisation checks on one of its fCVE-2026-783629.8The SEO Flow by LupsOnline WordPress plugin before 3.0.3 does not correctly validate the credential supplied with its API requests, allowingCVE-2026-783634.8The MW WP Form WordPress plugin before 5.1.5 does not prevent shortcodes in user-submitted values from being executed when it merges those vCVE-2026-783643.5The MW WP Form WordPress plugin before 5.1.6 does not sanitise and escape some of its form settings before outputting them back in an admin CVE-2026-783659.3Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in the supplier API in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM 4.0.0 through 5.3.1 allows any authenticateCVE-2026-783677.0A vulnerability was found in RPM's rpmbuild tarball processing. When processing a crafted source archive, the getTarSpec() function in toolsCVE-2026-783698.8RansomLook contains a missing authentication vulnerability in the /admin/crypto/group/new endpoint. While the endpoint provides an administrCVE-2026-78373.7A time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) condition in the ad_flush function in Netatalk 3.0.0 through 4.4.2 involves root-privileged file operatCVE-2026-783709.2RansomLook contains an authorization flaw in its legacy database export functionality that can allow unauthenticated remote users to retrievCVE-2026-783715.9The File Uploads Addon for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.7.6 does not verify that the person requesting a customer-uploaded file is
CVE-2026-78358: Medium severity, CVSS 4.3 | Vulnix