CVE-2026-34182

CriticalCVSS 9.1/10Last modified Jul 23, 2026

Description

Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises.

Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity validation for a given message.

In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the message.

An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK (the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB (Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with an attacker-chosen IV and ciphertext. The victim initializes AES-256-OFB under the real CEK, never consults the MAC field, and CMS_decrypt() returns success.

If the application under attack responds to the attacker with any indicator showing success or failure of the decryption effort, it is possible for the attacker to use this as an oracle to obtain key equivalent functionality for the CEK used for the chosen recipient of the message.

In another use case, an attacker can reduce the tag length of the chosen AEAD cipher for a given AuthEnvelopedData container to be a single byte long, allowing an attacker to brute force CMS decryption, producing an integrity bypass for applications that trust CMS_decrypt() to reject modified content.

The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.

Metrics

CVSS 3.1 9.1/10CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Weakness enumeration

Affected software

No affected versions have been published.

Timeline

Published
Jun 9, 2026
Last modified
Jul 23, 2026
NVD status
Analyzed

Related CVEs from 2026

CVE-2026-341837.5Issue summary: Remote peer may exhaust heap memory of the QUIC server or client by flooding it with packets containing PATH_CHALLENGE framesCVE-2026-341849.1AlanWeb SCADA does not enforce authorization for some directories. This allows an unauthorized attacker to read all files in these directoriCVE-2026-341858.8AlanWeb SCADA is vulnerable to SQL Injection across most scripts and input parameters. Because no protections are in place, an authenticatedCVE-2026-341868.8Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command vulnerability allows SQL Injection via custom fields. This issue affects CVE-2026-341879.8Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command vulnerability allows SQL Injection via graph container parameter. This isCVE-2026-341887.2Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerability allows OS Command Injection via Event Response execution. ThCVE-2026-341895.9Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability allows unauthorized deletion of event responses via a forged GET request when an authenticatCVE-2026-34195.3Fastify incorrectly accepts malformed `Content-Type` headers containing trailing characters after the subtype token, in violation of RFC 911CVE-2026-341905.9Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability allows unauthorized deletion of alert commands via sequential, unvalidated GET requests whenCVE-2026-341919.1Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Apache Portable Runtime Utility via apCVE-2026-341927.7Software installed and run as a non-privileged user may conduct improper GPU system calls to cause an error path leading to UAF of GPU page CVE-2026-341934.3Kernel software installed and running inside a Guest/Host VM may post improper commands to the GPU Firmware to trigger a write of data outsi
CVE-2026-34182: Critical severity, CVSS 9.1 | Vulnix