Description
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.
Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.
CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference
Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).
When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.
Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
Metrics
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HWeakness enumeration
Affected software
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL | >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.2; >= 3.6.0, < 3.6.4; >= 3.5.0, < 3.5.8; >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.7 |
References
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1e8c398db67404babd3e5af999bb6bd86f720c76Patch
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/581aaa0f0a35d214740f0fe1f5283ec41f1212e1Patch
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d0af20478688a6aa2f59d61caa3f82136b181d7fPatch
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/dad836b071da6579510c968615848ba03cac593bPatch
- https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txtVendor Advisory
Timeline
- Published
- Aug 25, 2026
- Last modified
- Sep 11, 2026
- NVD status
- Analyzed