CVE-2024-5535

CriticalCVSS 9.1/10Last modified Oct 15, 2026

Description

Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer.

Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application.

The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists).

This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem.

In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur.

This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely.

The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.

Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available.

Metrics

CVSS 3.1 9.1/10CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Weakness enumeration

Affected software

No affected versions have been published.

Timeline

Published
Jun 27, 2024
Last modified
Oct 15, 2026
NVD status
Deferred

Related CVEs from 2024

CVE-2024-553548.8Lucee before 5.4.7.3 LTS and 6 before 6.1.1.118, when an attacker can place files on the server, is vulnerable to a protection mechanism faiCVE-2024-55365.4The GamiPress – Link plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's gamipress_link shortcode in all versCVE-2024-553719.8Wallos <= 2.38.2 has a file upload vulnerability in the restore backup function, which allows authenticated users to restore backups by uploCVE-2024-553729.8Wallos <=2.38.2 has a file upload vulnerability in the restore database function, which allows unauthenticated users to restore database by CVE-2024-553745.3REDCap 14.3.13 allows an attacker to enumerate usernames due to an observable discrepancy between login attempts.CVE-2024-55399.2The Access Control Bypass vulnerability found in ALC WebCTRL and Carrier i-Vu in versions up to and including 8.5 allows a malicious actor tCVE-2024-553986.54C Strategies Exonaut before v22.4 was discovered to contain insecure permissions.CVE-2024-553996.54C Strategies Exonaut before v21.6.2.1-1 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2024-55406.9The reflective cross-site scripting vulnerability found in ALC WebCTRL and Carrier i-Vu in versions older than 8.0 affects login panels alloCVE-2024-554016.5An issue in 4C Strategies Exonaut before v22.4 allows attackers to execute a directory traversal.CVE-2024-554025.34C Strategies Exonaut before v22.4 was discovered to contain an access control issue.CVE-2024-554077.8An issue in the DeviceloControl function of ITE Tech. Inc ITE IO Access v1.0.0.0 allows attackers to perform arbitrary port read and write a
CVE-2024-5535: Critical severity, CVSS 9.1 | Vulnix