CVE-2022-26116

HighCVSS 8.8/10Last modified Jun 17, 2026

Description

Multiple improper neutralization of special elements used in SQL commands ('SQL Injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] in FortiNAC version 8.3.7 and below, 8.5.2 and below, 8.5.4, 8.6.0, 8.6.5 and below, 8.7.6 and below, 8.8.11 and below, 9.1.5 and below, 9.2.2 and below may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted strings parameters.

Metrics

CVSS 3.1 8.8/10CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Weakness enumeration

CWE-89

Affected software

No affected versions have been published.

Timeline

Published
May 11, 2022
Last modified
Jun 17, 2026
NVD status
Modified

Related CVEs from 2022

CVE-2022-261178.8An empty password in configuration file vulnerability [CWE-258] in FortiNAC version 8.3.7 and below, 8.5.2 and below, 8.5.4, 8.6.0, 8.6.5 anCVE-2022-261186.7A privilege chaining vulnerability [CWE-268] in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer 6.0.x, 6.2.x, 6.4.0 through 6.4.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.3 may alCVE-2022-261197.8A improper authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM before 6.5.0 allows a local attacker with CLI access to perform operations on CVE-2022-26126.5Side-channel information leakage in Keyboard input in Google Chrome prior to 104.0.5112.79 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised theCVE-2022-261208.8Multiple improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerabilities [CWE-89] in FortiADC managemenCVE-2022-261215.3An exposure of resource to wrong sphere vulnerability [CWE-668] in FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager GUI 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 6.4.0 through 6.4CVE-2022-261228.6An insufficient verification of data authenticity vulnerability [CWE-345] in FortiClient, FortiMail and FortiOS AV engines version 6.2.168 aCVE-2022-261247.8Improper buffer restrictions in BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) NUC Boards, Intel(R) NUC 8 Boards, Intel(R) NUC 8 Rugged Boards and Intel(R)CVE-2022-261257.8Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in FRRouting through 8.1.0 due to wrong checks on the input packet length in isisd/isis_tlvs.c.CVE-2022-261267.8Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in FRRouting through 8.1.0 due to the use of strdup with a non-zero-terminated binary string in isis_nCVE-2022-261277.8A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in FRRouting through 8.1.0 due to missing a check on the input packet length in the babel_packet_examCVE-2022-261287.8A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in FRRouting through 8.1.0 due to a wrong check on the input packet length in the babel_packet_examin